August 5, 2003
| 1993 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | ||||||
| 2002 | ||||||
| 2003 | ||||||
| January | ||||||
| February | ||||||
| March | ||||||
| April | ||||||
| May | ||||||
| June | ||||||
| July | ||||||
| August | ||||||
| Su | M | Tu | W | Th | F | Sa |
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
| 31 | ||||||
| September | ||||||
| October | ||||||
| November | ||||||
| December | ||||||
| 2004 | ||||||
| 2005 | ||||||
| 2006 | ||||||
| 2007 | ||||||
| 2008 | ||||||
| 2009 | ||||||
| 2010 | ||||||
| 2011 | ||||||
| 2012 | ||||||
| 2013 | ||||||
| 2014 | ||||||
| 2015 | ||||||
| 2016 | ||||||
| 2017 | ||||||
| 2018 | ||||||
| 2019 | ||||||
Time For a New Phone?
Just saw on MSNBC that I could, in theory, keep my phone number if I switch wireless carriers. The downside? It probably wouldn't actually work.
The other downside is that the Samsung I currently have is the only one I've seen that allows multiple phone numbers per entry. For example, instead of "DadHome" and "DadCell" I have an entry "Dad" that contains home and cellular numbers I can pick from whenever I call my father (usually to borrow money). An extra step sometimes, but I like it better.
So... if I find a phone that does the same thing, and if the phone works on the Verizon network, which I'd probably switch to after seeing many good things about it, and if I can keep my current number, I think it's new-phone time.
BF Atom Feed
My Verizon phone does that.
I have the LG VX6000. I can store 2 home numbers, 2 office numbers, 2 cell numbers, and 1 pager number per entry. I can also store X number of e-mail addresses, where X >= 3 (the most I've entered).
It also takes and e-mails pictures.
Reply to this comment.
Re: My Verizon phone does that.
Cool, I'll have to remember that. I haven't been looking since I figure the keeping-the-number thing woun't happen for a while yet, but I'm hoping it happens sooner than later.
Reply to this comment.